2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2013.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring soil restoration in an open-pit mine in northern Italy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The edaphic communities play important roles in assisting soil formation, contributing to the improvement of soil characteristics and playing a key role in several processes, thus being a useful tool for evaluating and monitoring soil quality (MENTA et al, 2014). In addition, edaphic populations can be affected by factors such as soil type, vegetation, and climatic conditions (BERUDE et al, 2015), and can thus inform about the state of degradation, recovery, conservation or even climate change.…”
Section: Arthropod Bioindicators Of Environmental Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The edaphic communities play important roles in assisting soil formation, contributing to the improvement of soil characteristics and playing a key role in several processes, thus being a useful tool for evaluating and monitoring soil quality (MENTA et al, 2014). In addition, edaphic populations can be affected by factors such as soil type, vegetation, and climatic conditions (BERUDE et al, 2015), and can thus inform about the state of degradation, recovery, conservation or even climate change.…”
Section: Arthropod Bioindicators Of Environmental Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Degraded soils are in the middle, followed by cropped lands. The QBS-ar index has been used successfully to test for the effects of forest cutting, grazing, trampling, industrial activities, emission, agriculture, heavy metals, and other anthropogenic effects (Gardi, Menta, & Leoni, 2008;Menta, Conti, Pinto, Leoni, & Lozano-Fondoon, 2014).…”
Section: Soil Meso-faunal Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EMI is a valué assigned at each taxonomic group and ranges from 1 to 20, from the lowest to the greatest adaptation to the soil. For more details see Gardi et al (2008); Tabaglio et al (2009);Menta et al (2011);Blasi et al (2013) and Menta et al (2014).…”
Section: Soil Biodiversity íNdicesmentioning
confidence: 99%