2019
DOI: 10.3133/ofr20191059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring storm tide from Hurricane Michael along the northwest coast of Florida, October 2018

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although no other instrument records exist in the Mexico Beach area, both the present team and separately the USGS took numerous high water marks (HWMs). Table 1 lists the data taken during this study, while Open-file Report 2019-1059 references the USGS data as a freely available download (Byrne 2019). Both show a picture generally consistent with the water level gauge.…”
Section: Wind Waves Surge and Runupmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although no other instrument records exist in the Mexico Beach area, both the present team and separately the USGS took numerous high water marks (HWMs). Table 1 lists the data taken during this study, while Open-file Report 2019-1059 references the USGS data as a freely available download (Byrne 2019). Both show a picture generally consistent with the water level gauge.…”
Section: Wind Waves Surge and Runupmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The only in situ instrument measurement of Michael's waves and surge came from the United States Geological Survey (USGS) rapid gauge FLBAY03283, which was mounted on one of the pilings on the Mexico Beach Pier (Byrne 2019). The deck and almost all of the pilings seaward of the gauge were destroyed, but the gauge itself survived and provided good measurements.…”
Section: Wind Waves Surge and Runupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To validate that the simulation methodology produces realistic results, we compared storm surge output from the Best track simulation with observations taken during Hurricane Michael in the primary area of interest. Based on [38], we selected the 17 USGS water level sensors (https://stn.wim.usgs.gov/FEV/#2018Michael, accessed on 14 November 2023; [74]) shown in Figure 4 and Table 2. We matched each observation location with the closest wet ADCIRC node (given the mesh spacing of ~200 m near the coast), converted the observation data from feet to meters, and then compared simulated and observed maximum water levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowledge of overwater turbulence intensity (TI) at the wind-turbine hub height is essential for offshore wind-power research, development, operation and maintenance. According to [13,20], TI at height Z may be written as TI z = 2㤮‷U U z = 1 Ln Z Z 16 and following [18], Z = 1200 H s H s 4㤮‷ 17 Here Z o is the aerodynamic roughness length in m and the parameter H s /L p is the wave steepness. Now, if a wind farm is situated in deep water environment or there is no wave shoaling problem, one may use the values of U * and U z as nowcasted from Equations ( 3) and ( 8), respectively, to estimate TI z .…”
Section: Estimating Overwater Turbulence Intensitymentioning
confidence: 99%