2013
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-013-2664-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring surface elevation changes in Jharia coalfield, India using synthetic aperture radar interferometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Shuttle Radar Topographic Mission (SRTM) and the Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) have allowed detailed analyses in large regions . Synthetic aperture radar interferometry was employed to monitor surface elevation changes in Jharia coalfield of India (Gupta et al 2014).…”
Section: Data Fusion Of Ground Measurements and Satellite Observationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Shuttle Radar Topographic Mission (SRTM) and the Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) have allowed detailed analyses in large regions . Synthetic aperture radar interferometry was employed to monitor surface elevation changes in Jharia coalfield of India (Gupta et al 2014).…”
Section: Data Fusion Of Ground Measurements and Satellite Observationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, 30 points were selected with precisely defined elevation and location (geodetic reference points), and on this basis the vertical RMS (Root Mean Square) error was calculated using commonly available methodology and formulae [22]. The error value was 1.05 m. This result is better in the analyzed case than that obtained using SAR (synthetic aperture radar) interferometry, which was 2.3 m [10]. This result is better in the analyzed case than that obtained using SAR (synthetic aperture radar) interferometry, which was 2.3 m [10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This study, however, was aimed at comparing the methods of model preparation, and not transformations related to mining activity. The topic of design and comparison of terrain models in areas of mining activity has also been present in scientific studies by [10,11], whereas the issue of differences between models of the same terrain, resulting from different input data, was dealt with by the following authors: [12]. Subsidence of terrain above galleries of underground mines, as well as the problem of paludification and lake density in these areas, also with a comparison of terrain models from different periods, was the subject of research conducted in the Upper Silesian Industrial Region [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies are based on either satellite observations (e.g., Gupta et al 2014) or ground observations (e.g., Alkhasawneh et al 2014;Liu et al 2013). It has been proven that simulation results would have bigger errors when only satellite measurements or ground measurements are considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%