2002
DOI: 10.1080/02652030110087447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring the content and intake of trace elements from food in Denmark

Abstract: The content of cadmium, lead, nickel, mercury and selenium in 83 foods was monitored from 1993 to 1997. In comparison with similar results from 1988 to 1992, a general decrease in lead levels had occurred, whereas the contents of cadmium, nickel, mercury and selenium were stable or declined only slightly. The distribution in dietary intake of the five trace elements was estimated by combining the mean trace element concentrations with food consumption data from 1837 Danes aged 15-80 years. The lead intake for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

19
68
7

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
19
68
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The nickel levels obtained in pig liver in this study parallel those reported in the literature: Finland (< 20 μg/100g, Nuurtamo et al, 1980), Sweden (11 μg/100g, Jorhem et al, 1989), Denmark (17 μg/100g, ranged from 14 to 139 μg/100g, Larsen et al, 2002) and Spain (9 μg/100g, ranged from not detected to 31 μg/100g, Lopez-Alonso et al, 2007). Not much data are available for nickel content of pig liver in many countries.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The nickel levels obtained in pig liver in this study parallel those reported in the literature: Finland (< 20 μg/100g, Nuurtamo et al, 1980), Sweden (11 μg/100g, Jorhem et al, 1989), Denmark (17 μg/100g, ranged from 14 to 139 μg/100g, Larsen et al, 2002) and Spain (9 μg/100g, ranged from not detected to 31 μg/100g, Lopez-Alonso et al, 2007). Not much data are available for nickel content of pig liver in many countries.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…(33.5 % of TWI), in accordance with the established PTWI percentages for total diet studies (1.6-36 %, Lee et al, 2006;Nasreddine et al, 2006;Larsen et al, 2002;Ysart et al, 1999;Urieta, Jalon, & Eguileor, 1996;Becker, & Kumpulainen, 1991) which considered that the largest source of mercury contamination lies in fish and shellfish.…”
Section: Estimated Dietary Intake Of Mercury and Arsenicmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…On the basis of the result from the last analysis, exposure doses corresponding to response rates of 50% (ED 50 ), 25% (ED 25 ), 10% (ED 10 ), 5% (ED 5 ) and 1% (ED 1 ) of exposed nickel-sensitive eczema patients were calculated ( Table 2). These calculations predict that an oral nickel exposure with 0.22 mg, 0.35 mg or 0.53 mg nickel (depending on which dose-response curve is used) will make 1% of nickel-sensitive patients respond.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The doses used in the studies vary from 0.3 mg to 5.6 mg nickel (Table 1), while normal daily dietary nickel intake has been found to vary from 0.02 mg to 0.48 mg nickel (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32). However, some studies have shown that an exposure dose equivalent to the maximal nickel exposure through the diet (0.9 mg nickel per day) (21) can induce systemic reactions in some nickel-sensitive individuals (6,8,9,13,20).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%