2022
DOI: 10.1080/23248378.2022.2103849
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring the dynamic response of track formation with retaining wall to heavy-haul train passage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 17 shows the distribution of earth pressure at the wall back and the variations in resultant force ∆E of the additional earth pressure induced by the train load with operating speed. As shown in Figure 17a, the FDM and test values [53] of earth pressure at rest against the wall without train traffic are in good agreement above the ground level, with slight deviations near the ground level. The additional earth pressure on the central crosssection of the model is minimally impacted by the loading position, with the calculated and measured values being roughly identical.…”
Section: Analysis Of Roadbed and Retaining Wallmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Figure 17 shows the distribution of earth pressure at the wall back and the variations in resultant force ∆E of the additional earth pressure induced by the train load with operating speed. As shown in Figure 17a, the FDM and test values [53] of earth pressure at rest against the wall without train traffic are in good agreement above the ground level, with slight deviations near the ground level. The additional earth pressure on the central crosssection of the model is minimally impacted by the loading position, with the calculated and measured values being roughly identical.…”
Section: Analysis Of Roadbed and Retaining Wallmentioning
confidence: 62%