1998
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1615377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring the Effect of Heparin Bolus during Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty (PTCA): Assessment of Three Bedside Coagulation Monitors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We compared the assay results with those obtained using a laboratory APTT, ACT, Heptest, and anti-Xa. Unfortunately, we had to confirm previous findings that the APTT is unsuitable for monitoring the high doses of UFH required in patients undergoing angioplasty [18]. Although both APTT assays were very precise as measured by interassay correlation coefficients, the APTTs determined by both methods did not agree and cannot be used interchangeably (Figure 2).…”
Section: Abbildungmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…We compared the assay results with those obtained using a laboratory APTT, ACT, Heptest, and anti-Xa. Unfortunately, we had to confirm previous findings that the APTT is unsuitable for monitoring the high doses of UFH required in patients undergoing angioplasty [18]. Although both APTT assays were very precise as measured by interassay correlation coefficients, the APTTs determined by both methods did not agree and cannot be used interchangeably (Figure 2).…”
Section: Abbildungmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In the therapeutic range, the mean difference in results between the two devices was 30%. 23 Another recent study, which compared two POC devices (Hemochron Response®, International Technidyne Corporation, Parker, CO, USA and Aktalike®, Array Medical, Somerville, NJ, USA) to the older Hemochron 801® showed that the ACTs measured with the Aktalike® were 18% shorter than those measured with the Hemochron 801® (P = 0.0001). 24 The ability to detect a clot in the blood sample is, obviously, different between instruments and has an impact on the final result.…”
Section: S90mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 When aprotinin is used during CPB, the recommended empirical target value for the celite ACT is at least 750 sec, while it is 450 sec for the kaolin-ACT. 23 It is important to note that the target of 750 sec is based on in vitro data and that the threshold of 450 sec for the kaolin-ACT has not been validated by clinical studies. 29 Tranexamic acid does not modify ACT values, making anticoagulation easier to manage when POC monitors are used to monitor heparin effect.…”
Section: S90mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CoaguChek ® Pro), der Hemochron ® und der TAS (10). Die POCT-Bestimmung der aPTT ist nicht unproblematisch und deren Zuverlässigkeit und Nutzen wird unterschiedlich beurteilt (11)(12)(13)(14). (16,17).…”
Section: Kontrolle Der Heparinisierungunclassified