2010
DOI: 10.3832/ifor0538-003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring the effects of air pollution on forest condition in Europe: is crown defoliation an adequate indicator?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, climatic factors seem the most plausible cause of country-wide synchronized defoliation patterns since pollution, nitrogen and sulphur deposition, elevated ozone levels, and pests play local and minor roles as defoliation drivers [59][60][61]. In addition, crown condition poses some limitations to assess changes in forest vitality since defoliation estimates depend on site conditions (e.g., soil texture), disturbance history (e.g., storms), forest management (e.g., thinning), tree features (e.g., tree size and dominance), and defoliation estimates may be biased by methodological uncertainties (e.g., different crown assessment between countries or field teams) [62][63][64]. After considering these shortcomings, we argue that crown defoliation in Spanish forests reflects climatic factors (spring temperatures, drought as represented by the SPEI) rather than air pollution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, climatic factors seem the most plausible cause of country-wide synchronized defoliation patterns since pollution, nitrogen and sulphur deposition, elevated ozone levels, and pests play local and minor roles as defoliation drivers [59][60][61]. In addition, crown condition poses some limitations to assess changes in forest vitality since defoliation estimates depend on site conditions (e.g., soil texture), disturbance history (e.g., storms), forest management (e.g., thinning), tree features (e.g., tree size and dominance), and defoliation estimates may be biased by methodological uncertainties (e.g., different crown assessment between countries or field teams) [62][63][64]. After considering these shortcomings, we argue that crown defoliation in Spanish forests reflects climatic factors (spring temperatures, drought as represented by the SPEI) rather than air pollution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This guaranteed the use of harmonized criteria in all the European plots for the spatiotemporal evaluation of the defoliation data collected in the field. In addition, to avoid subjectivity in the visual evaluation of defoliation (Ferretti, 1998;Johnson and Jacob, 2010), quality controls were performed by independent teams, whose members compared and verified estimations from the sampled plots.…”
Section: Defoliation Data Selection and Quality Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, in order to ensure the reliability of data, calibration and quality test of the monitoring program must be in place. EU/ICP Forests and FHM have devoted great efforts in these aspects [28][29][30] while the SFA protocol still needs to develop a more detailed procedure for calibration and quality testing.…”
Section: The Strength and Limitations Of China's Monitoring Programmentioning
confidence: 99%