In
the past decade, mesocosms have emerged as a useful tool for
the environmental study of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) as they
can mimic the relevant exposure scenario of contamination. Herein,
we analyzed the scientific outcomes of aquatic mesocosm experiments,
with regard to their designs, the ENMs tested, and the end points
investigated. Several mesocosm designs were consistently applied in
the past decade to virtually mimic various contamination scenarios
with regard to ecosystem setting as well as ENMs class, dose, and
dosing. Statistical analyses were carried out with the literature
data to identify the main parameters driving ENM distribution in the
mesocosms and the potential risk posed to benthic and planktonic communities
as well as global ecosystem responses. These analyses showed that
at the end of the exposure, mesocosm size (water volume), experiment
duration, and location indoor/outdoor had major roles in defining
the ENMs/metal partitioning. Moreover, a higher exposure of the benthic
communities is often observed but did not necessarily translate to
a higher risk due to the lower hazard posed by transformed ENMs in
the sediments (e.g., aggregated, sulfidized). However, planktonic
organisms were generally exposed to lower concentrations of potentially
more reactive and toxic ENM species. Hence, mesocosms can be complementary
tools to existing standard operational procedures for regulatory purposes
and environmental fate and risk assessment of ENMs. To date, the research
was markedly unbalanced toward the investigation of metal-based ENMs
compared to metalloid- and carbon-based ENMs but also nanoenabled
products. Future studies are expected to fill this gap, with special
regard to high production volume and potentially hazardous ENMs. Finally,
to take full advantage of mesocosms, future studies must be carefully
planned to incorporate interdisciplinary approaches and ensure that
the large data sets produced are fully exploited.