2015
DOI: 10.3354/esr00703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring the gray whale sound exposure mitigation zone and estimating acoustic transmission during a 4-D seismic survey, Sakhalin Island, Russia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three non-telemetric AUARs were located closer to shore in water depths of 10 m to provide detailed information on sound propagation for post hoc analyses (Rutenko et al 2012). Racca et al (2015, this Theme Section) provide further details of acous tic data acquisition during the seismic survey. For analysis, the sound levels from the seismic source required distinct treatment for periods of seismic survey activity ('on') and periods devoid of it ('off').…”
Section: Acoustic Monitoring and Sound-level Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Three non-telemetric AUARs were located closer to shore in water depths of 10 m to provide detailed information on sound propagation for post hoc analyses (Rutenko et al 2012). Racca et al (2015, this Theme Section) provide further details of acous tic data acquisition during the seismic survey. For analysis, the sound levels from the seismic source required distinct treatment for periods of seismic survey activity ('on') and periods devoid of it ('off').…”
Section: Acoustic Monitoring and Sound-level Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To examine the behavioural responses of the whales, sound level variables were estimated at the tracked animal's location for each observation bin in the behavioural dataset (see Racca et al 2015 for further details). Gray whales were exposed to an average per-pulse sound exposure level (SEL) from the seismic survey of 132 dB re 1 μPa 2 -s (range: 99 to 156 dB re 1 μPa 2 -s, n = 161; Fig.…”
Section: Acoustic Monitoring and Sound-level Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cSEL calculations used the es timated median sound exposure level (SEL) over depth for individual seismic acquisition pulses and did not include contributions of non-pulse sound energy from other sources. Details of the acoustic numerical modelling are provided in Racca et al (2015).…”
Section: Sound Covariatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is possible to conduct ground-truthing of far-field received levels (e.g. Bröker et al 2015;Racca et al 2015;Nowacek and Southall 2016), ground-truthing cannot be conducted in short timeframes to inform adaptive mitigation. Further explanation of the merits and limitations of different ground-truthing methods is covered in the Report of the Acoustic Ground-Truthing Technical Working Group as part of New Zealand's 2015-2016 Seismic Code of Conduct Review process (Department of Conservation 2016).…”
Section: Sound Source Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%