2021
DOI: 10.3161/00016454ao2021.56.2.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring the Hatching Success of Gulls Laridae and Terns Sternidae: A Comparison of Ground and Drone Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although similar effects have been noted many times elsewhere (Koffjberg et al ., 2016; Ritenour et al ., 2022) by traditional observation, i.e., repeated field surveys, the present study combined these with the use of a drone. This rapidly obtained reliable data with very little disturbance to the birds, as demonstrated on several occasions with terns, gulls and other species in the Northern Adriatic wetlands (Valle & Scarton, 2021a, b, c).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although similar effects have been noted many times elsewhere (Koffjberg et al ., 2016; Ritenour et al ., 2022) by traditional observation, i.e., repeated field surveys, the present study combined these with the use of a drone. This rapidly obtained reliable data with very little disturbance to the birds, as demonstrated on several occasions with terns, gulls and other species in the Northern Adriatic wetlands (Valle & Scarton, 2021a, b, c).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…All apparently occupied nests (as defined by Steinkamp et al , 2003) were counted and the number of breeding pairs was assumed to be the same as the number of occupied nests. We used a small drone (DJI Mini 2) to count nesting pairs and to measure reproductive success at selected sites (after Valle & Scarton, 2021a, b). All data in the present study were obtained using drone imagery.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The risk of disturbance and collisions from drones should thus be placed within the context of the risks and inefficiencies of on‐foot monitoring. For example, monitoring tern nests with drones is 2.89 times faster than on‐foot observations (based on information provided by Valle & Scarton, 2021 ). Also, if Stork ( Ciconia Ciconia ) parents leave their nests during monitoring events, their return time to the nest is shorter when monitored with drones than on‐foot monitoring (Zbyryt et al., 2021 ), further emphasising the reduction in stress from drone monitoring.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drone flights were performed according to current recommendations to minimize disturbance to birds (Hodgson & Koh 2016). The drone was launched at least at 150 m from the colony, it climbed vertically to 70 m above ground level (AGL) and then approached the colony, using a lawn mower flight pattern (Valle & Scarton 2021b) to reach a point above the colony at 20–70 m AGL, where it hovered to take imagery at an angle as vertical as possible in order to minimize variations in subject size and shape (Chabot & Francis 2016). Nests were searched and monitored flying at elevations above ground level higher than the agitation distance for Ardeidae in general and in particular for the studied species (10 m; Valle & Scarton 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%