2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2010.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring the stability of an Anammox reactor under high salinity conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(31 reference statements)
1
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Since number of reported ionic species varies among landfills, then estimation of total salinity in terms of TDS (by applying conversion factor, or through summation of major dissolved ions) was not feasible. However by referring to maximum value of major inorganics (maximum value, in mg/L: Cl=3000, SO 4 =2100, Na=1800, K =1100, Ca=360, Mg=170) and heavy metals (maximum value, in mg/L: Pb=4.1, Mn=1.1, Cd=1, other heavy metals < 1) in the leachate, and considering the inhibitory effect of these contaminants on anammox bacteria (Bi et al, 2014;Dapena-Mora et al, 2007;Dapena-Mora et al, 2010;Huang et al, 2014), then salinity and concentration of heavy metals are most likely to be below the minimum threshold for inhibition. However some of these substances should still be present at low concentrations, to prevent nutrient starvation for anammox bacteria (Zhang et al, 2016b).…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since number of reported ionic species varies among landfills, then estimation of total salinity in terms of TDS (by applying conversion factor, or through summation of major dissolved ions) was not feasible. However by referring to maximum value of major inorganics (maximum value, in mg/L: Cl=3000, SO 4 =2100, Na=1800, K =1100, Ca=360, Mg=170) and heavy metals (maximum value, in mg/L: Pb=4.1, Mn=1.1, Cd=1, other heavy metals < 1) in the leachate, and considering the inhibitory effect of these contaminants on anammox bacteria (Bi et al, 2014;Dapena-Mora et al, 2007;Dapena-Mora et al, 2010;Huang et al, 2014), then salinity and concentration of heavy metals are most likely to be below the minimum threshold for inhibition. However some of these substances should still be present at low concentrations, to prevent nutrient starvation for anammox bacteria (Zhang et al, 2016b).…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under this condition, anammox activity was slightly reduced at the initial stages but gradually increased thereafter. Similarly, the presence of NaCl was observed to enhance the aggregation of anammox biomass and stimulate anammox activity at NaCl concentrations of 6-15 g/L [162]. In another study [170], the addition of 5 g/L NaCl and CaCl 2 favored the formation of anammox biofilms in an 1 L SBR reactor operated in continuous mode.…”
Section: Inhibition By Salinitymentioning
confidence: 86%
“…At a smaller scale batch test with 25 mL vials using anammox sludge dominated by "Candidatus Kuenenia stuttgartiensis", the IC 50 value of NaCl was determined at 13.45 g/L [26]. The inhibition of salinity shock on nitrogen removal performance of anammox was generally found in the range from 10-15 g/L [162,166,[168][169][170]172,173]. A complete inhibition of anammox activity was observed in a 10 L MBBR reactor continuously fed with NaCl of 15 g/L [168].…”
Section: Inhibition By Salinitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Dapena‐Mora and colleagues (2007 ) showed that addition of 2.9, 5.9, 8.8 and 11.7 g NaCl l −1 to a non‐adapted AnAOB community resulted in about 120%, 110%, 95%, 85% of the anammox activity relative to the activity without salt respectively. In a follow‐up study, it was shown that the specific anammox activity of salt‐adapted biomass increased for salt concentrations up to 15 g NaCl l −1 ( Dapena‐Mora et al ., 2010 ). In a similar salinity/conductivity range, successful anammox performance has been reported for the treatment of several real effluents: sludge reject water containing 2.0–6.2 and 1.1–2.7 mS cm −1 (∼ 0.4–1.1 g NaCl l −1 ) after treatment ( Szatkowska et al ., 2007 ; Siegrist et al ., 2008 ; Joss et al ., 2009 ; Jeanningros et al ., 2010 ; Zubrowska‐Sudol et al ., 2011 ), black water digestate containing 7.9 mS cm −1 ( Vlaeminck et al ., 2009a ), digestate from fish canning industry containing 8–10 g NaCl l −1 ( Dapena‐Mora et al ., 2006 ), landfill leachate containing 11–65 mS cm −1 , and up to 28 mS cm −1 (∼ 13 g NaCl l −1 ) after treatment ( Siegrist et al ., 1998 ; Ruscalleda, 2012 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%