2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.01.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring tissue engineered constructs and protocols with laboratory-based x-ray phase contrast tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the same parameters and procedures, we then scanned a more complex sample: a decellularised piglet esophagus (a so-called “scaffold”), which had been prepared in the context of tissue engineering research (Savvidis et al 32 ), to demonstrate the ability to extract three-modal images from a single flyscan (Fig. 4 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the same parameters and procedures, we then scanned a more complex sample: a decellularised piglet esophagus (a so-called “scaffold”), which had been prepared in the context of tissue engineering research (Savvidis et al 32 ), to demonstrate the ability to extract three-modal images from a single flyscan (Fig. 4 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This sample was chosen as it contains challenging biological tissue, with small features which conventional X-ray imaging techniques struggle to resolve. More details about the design of the data acquisition experiment can be found in 9 . The region of interest covered 413 × 143 pixels, with a 50 µm pixel size, for each projection angle, with 1200 such angles from 0 • to 359.7 • .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A series of samples were then scanned for tomography: a multi-material phantom, consisting of HDPE, PP and cornflower cylinders; a short-fibre reinforced composite; a pouch cell battery and a tissue-engineered oesophagus (See Savvidis et al for oesophageal sample preparation 14 ). The regular acquisition parameters were set as 8 dithering steps, 7 illumination curve points, 720 angular projections and 1.2 seconds of exposure, however, the high attenuation of the pouch cell battery meant that 9 illumination curve points were used to increase the statistics of the acquisition, and for the oesophagus where 1000 angular views were used for preserving the spatial resolution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%