2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2020.103666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring underwater nourishments using multibeam bathymetric and backscatter time series

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because they are independent of human perception, they provide objective and repeatable results that cannot be achieved using traditional, manual analysis (Diesing et al 2016). Automatic classification of MBES data sets for different time steps is the foundation of change-detection analysis, which has recently been a significant research topic in the discipline of benthic habitat mapping (Montereale- Gaida et al 2020;Janowski et al 2020). The accuracy assessment based on ground-truth samples allows for the possible verification of classifier performance, which is highly desirable from a scientific perspective.…”
Section: Gaps In the Existing Knowledge That This Study Wants To Covermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because they are independent of human perception, they provide objective and repeatable results that cannot be achieved using traditional, manual analysis (Diesing et al 2016). Automatic classification of MBES data sets for different time steps is the foundation of change-detection analysis, which has recently been a significant research topic in the discipline of benthic habitat mapping (Montereale- Gaida et al 2020;Janowski et al 2020). The accuracy assessment based on ground-truth samples allows for the possible verification of classifier performance, which is highly desirable from a scientific perspective.…”
Section: Gaps In the Existing Knowledge That This Study Wants To Covermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather, it relates to differences in a combination of acoustic impedance contrasts, sediment, and topographic roughness (i.e., at the level of the grain size which exhibits intrinsic roughness and at the level of sub-beam topographic roughness such as oscillatory ripples) and sediment volume inhomogeneities [68]. Refining the relationship between frequency, seafloor type (including porosity, compactness and permeability) and backscatter response is continually being improved [14,16,63,65,69,70]. Further developments to better utilise backscatter data such as angular response analysis (ARA) [71][72][73] and the hyper-angular cube (HAC) [21,74] may also increase the predictive power of acoustic data [75].…”
Section: Acoustic Discriminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It allowed them to compare average backscatter values from one survey to another. The recent study of Gaida et al [13] showed a promising application of unsupervised Bayesian classification to time-series of MBES measurements. For comparison, OBIA was not designed to perform typical unsupervised classification, based on backscatter intensity values.…”
Section: Suggestions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the recent rapid development of hydroacoustic devices and tools for geomorphometric analysis, detection of spatial and temporal changes of benthic habitats over time was only recently investigated [10][11][12][13][14][15]. The main measuring device used for high-resolution spatial mapping of the seafloor is the multibeam echosounder (MBES) [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%