2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.05.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring Universal Protocol Compliance Through Real-Time Clandestine Observation by Medical Students Results in Performance Improvement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative method for monitoring compliance is a real-time "clandestine" observation. Such a strategy, with medical students observing the compliance in operating rooms, has been shown to improve compliance [13]. Finally, centralized monitoring has also been shown helpful in diminishing quality defects in multicenter trials [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative method for monitoring compliance is a real-time "clandestine" observation. Such a strategy, with medical students observing the compliance in operating rooms, has been shown to improve compliance [13]. Finally, centralized monitoring has also been shown helpful in diminishing quality defects in multicenter trials [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have demonstrated methods for compliance monitoring (e.g., real-time, clandestine observation) and their value for continuous improvement of care processes and protocols (85).…”
Section: Concurrent Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that, despite being a mandatory step in the UP, pre-surgical "time outs" only occur in 89.7% of cases. 45 In 18.4% of cases, at least one member of the surgical team is inattentive during the timeout 45 . Perhaps most surprising, despite UP implementation, the surgical site remains unmarked in 8.2% of cases.…”
Section: Current Initiativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps most surprising, despite UP implementation, the surgical site remains unmarked in 8.2% of cases. 45 The data supporting the overall effectiveness of the UP in preventing surgical errors of "wrong site, wrong-patient, wrong-procedure" is mixed. In a retrospective analysis of non-spine wrong-site operations performed, 63% were found to potentially avoidable if the UP had been implemented.…”
Section: Current Initiativesmentioning
confidence: 99%