1981
DOI: 10.3758/bf03207955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring visual activity in infant rhesus monkeys: Method and calibration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1984
1984

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The obtained pattern of change (viz., from Week 1 to Week 3 with little subsequent change) was similar to the pattern of results in a study efface scanning with eight of the same monkeys (Mendelson et al, 1981). During Week 1, monkeys did not differentiate between pictures of faces looking back at them and faces looking away; in contrast, during Weeks 3 and 7, monkeys fixated the faces looking back less than the faces looking away.…”
Section: Age-related Changes In Looking At Geometric Formssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The obtained pattern of change (viz., from Week 1 to Week 3 with little subsequent change) was similar to the pattern of results in a study efface scanning with eight of the same monkeys (Mendelson et al, 1981). During Week 1, monkeys did not differentiate between pictures of faces looking back at them and faces looking away; in contrast, during Weeks 3 and 7, monkeys fixated the faces looking back less than the faces looking away.…”
Section: Age-related Changes In Looking At Geometric Formssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Visual activity was recorded with an infrared cornealreflection technique (see Figure 1), adapted from Haith (1969) for use with infant monkeys (details provided in Mendelson, Haith, & Goldman-Rakic, 1981). The experimenter held the infant monkey so that it faced a stimulus panel approximately 23 cm away.…”
Section: Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The needfor calibrating an instrument so that the direction of the subject's eyeis precisely mapped onto stimulus space is self-evident, and there are various schemes for doing this (Bullinger & Kaufmann, 1977); Carmody, Kundel, & Nodine, 1980;Harris, Hainline, & Abramov, 1981;Kliegl & Olson, 1981;Mendelson, Haith, & This work: was supported in part by Grants 13484 and 662199 from the PSC-CUNY Research Award Program and NIH Grant EY-03957. The authors' mailing address is: Department of Psychology, Brooklyn College of CUNY, Brooklyn.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%