2021
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2025400118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring war destruction from space using machine learning

Abstract: Existing data on building destruction in conflict zones rely on eyewitness reports or manual detection, which makes it generally scarce, incomplete, and potentially biased. This lack of reliable data imposes severe limitations for media reporting, humanitarian relief efforts, human-rights monitoring, reconstruction initiatives, and academic studies of violent conflict. This article introduces an automated method of measuring destruction in high-resolution satellite images using deep-learning techniques combine… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, with very high resolution images (1m) brick kilns are detected with a precision of 88% and with a very low probability to be missed [ 27 ], as well as trees in Sahel (0,5m) [ 28 ] that are detected up to a size of 3 m 2 with a very high recall of 95%. Last, our classifier achieves an Area Under Curve ( AUC ) of 0.86 on the test set ( S4 Fig ), which is similar and coherent with respect to the score of 0.84 obtained in [ 29 ] when detecting buildings’ destruction in conflict zones. To conclude, drawing a comparison to existing work highlights the necessity of making trade-offs between the area covered, the satellite resolution, the accuracy of the detection and the minimum size that can be detected.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…For instance, with very high resolution images (1m) brick kilns are detected with a precision of 88% and with a very low probability to be missed [ 27 ], as well as trees in Sahel (0,5m) [ 28 ] that are detected up to a size of 3 m 2 with a very high recall of 95%. Last, our classifier achieves an Area Under Curve ( AUC ) of 0.86 on the test set ( S4 Fig ), which is similar and coherent with respect to the score of 0.84 obtained in [ 29 ] when detecting buildings’ destruction in conflict zones. To conclude, drawing a comparison to existing work highlights the necessity of making trade-offs between the area covered, the satellite resolution, the accuracy of the detection and the minimum size that can be detected.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Images of Gaza were used to assess building damage from the conflict in 2014. Similar research has been conducted for Syria using MAXAR imagery (Mueller et al, 2021). Even though individual building destruction may not directly and immediately impact environmental degradation, resources and space are needed to build new buildings and get rid of the ruins.…”
Section: Worldwide-other Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Easier access to imagery and cloud computing platform to store data and provide computing power has greatly increased extent, scope, and granularity with which satellite imagery is used to assess damages due to conflict since the review of studies on this topic by Witmer (2015). Documenting conflict effects in urban areas requires very high resolution imagery as illustrated by Mueller et al (2021) who develop a machine learning algorithm applied to Syria. 2 Effects of war on agricultural production can rely on lower resolution imagery as illustrated by studies such as Alix-Garcia et al (2013) for Darfur and a number of studies covering areas of the former Soviet Union including Ukraine to assess 1 As exposure to violence often leads the poorest to revert to subsistence as in Colombia (Arias et al 2019), levels of food consumption may not decline linearly with conflict exposure as shown in Afghanistan (D'Souza & Jolliffe 2013).…”
Section: Conflict and Food Security In The Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%