2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10064-012-0433-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring wells in clay: the apparently static water level and its influence during variable-head permeability tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as soon as the effective stresses become lower than the preconsolidation stresses everywhere, the elastic volumetric strain becomes null and ∇ 2 h = 0, which yield a straight derivative graph. As already stated, this new prediction was steadily observed with field slug tests in aquifers, and in soft clays …”
Section: Stress‐strain Solutions For Slug Testssupporting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, as soon as the effective stresses become lower than the preconsolidation stresses everywhere, the elastic volumetric strain becomes null and ∇ 2 h = 0, which yield a straight derivative graph. As already stated, this new prediction was steadily observed with field slug tests in aquifers, and in soft clays …”
Section: Stress‐strain Solutions For Slug Testssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Therefore, the stress‐strain conditions for clay predict a curved velocity graph at the beginning of a slug test (irreversible strains), and subsequently a straight line when the volumetric strain becomes elastic. This curvature is regularly observed with slug tests in clay where it lasts 1 to 2 days for a 1 to 2 month‐long test, and also with pulse tests in aquitards where it lasts during almost all test of duration 1 to 2 hours, long before being proven here using geomechanics.…”
Section: Stress‐strain Solutions For Slug Testssupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With methods based on a velocity graph, the time derivative in Equation is replaced by a finite difference approximation : SinjitalicckΔHΔt+H0=Hnormalmwhere H m is the mean hydraulic head for the time interval Δ t and H 0 is the piezometric error, a term added to Equation to acknowledge that the hydraulic head difference between the MW and the aquitard is not known a priori. For a MW installed in an aquitard, the initial ‘static’ water level always lags behind the real hydraulic head, which prevails in the aquitard . With the velocity graph method, H 0 , the difference between the real and apparent H values, can be estimated from the y ‐intercept of a plot of H m on the y ‐axis and Δ H /Δ t on the x ‐axis.…”
Section: Pulse Tests and Their Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like Equation (16) for the case of radial symmetry and plane strain deformations, matrix equation (Equation (32)) expresses the condition of static equilibrium for the total stress tensor. Equation (33) verifies the mass conservation of water and is thus analog to Equation (1), except that it is not based on a constant total stress hypothesis. Equations (32) and (33) are coupled through the relationship between total stress, effective stress, deformation and pore pressure: effective stress and deformation tensors.…”
Section: Numerical Type Curves For the Case Of A Partially Penetratinmentioning
confidence: 99%