2004
DOI: 10.1186/gb-2004-5-12-r98
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MONKEY: identifying conserved transcription-factor binding sites in multiple alignments using a binding site-specific evolutionary model

Abstract: We introduce a method (MONKEY) to identify conserved transcription-factor binding sites in multispecies alignments. MONKEY employs probabilistic models of factor specificity and bindingsite evolution, on which basis we compute the likelihood that putative sites are conserved and assign statistical significance to each hit. Using genomes from the genus Saccharomyces, we illustrate how the significance of real sites increases with evolutionary distance and explore the relationship between conservation and functi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
83
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We find a substantial improvement of the predictive quality already at the level of two species and a further improvement for three species. This confirms the results of a recent study of conserved sites in several Saccharomyces species, where the significance of the evolutionary information as a function of evolutionary distances is discussed in detail (15). Of course, elementary evolutionary steps other than point mutations are expected to become important in eukaryotes.…”
Section: Improving Binding Site Searches Requires a Quantitative Evolsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We find a substantial improvement of the predictive quality already at the level of two species and a further improvement for three species. This confirms the results of a recent study of conserved sites in several Saccharomyces species, where the significance of the evolutionary information as a function of evolutionary distances is discussed in detail (15). Of course, elementary evolutionary steps other than point mutations are expected to become important in eukaryotes.…”
Section: Improving Binding Site Searches Requires a Quantitative Evolsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…14 for protein-coding sequences and has been used in ref. 15. For binding sites, however, the factorized form is a heuristic approximation, because generic fitness landscapes are not additive.…”
Section: Q͑a͒ [4]mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, these methods are all based completely on substitution rates and ignore other sources of information about natural selection, such as patterns of substitution (Moses et al 2004;Pedersen et al 2006) or rates and patterns of insertion and deletion Siepel and Haussler 2004a;Lunter et al 2006). A recently introduced method, called SiPhy, attempts to exploit the pattern of substitution by using an LRT similar to phyloP's all-branch test, except that it treats the equilibrium nucleotide frequencies as free parameters to be estimated at each site for the alternative model (together with a branch-length scaling parameter) (Garber et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By searching for highly conserved sequences across multiple species, scientists have identified critical functional elements (Bejerano et al 2004;Pennacchio et al 2006;Prabhakar et al 2006). Sequence conservation is commonly used as input to programs that predict genes (Dewey et al 2004;Majoros et al 2005;Gross and Brent 2006), find transcription factor binding sites (Lenhard et al 2003;Moses et al 2004), and find other regulatory elements (de la Calle-Mustienes et al 2005;Abbasi et al 2007). The conservation signal used by all of these applications is based on alignments between the input genomic sequences.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%