1988
DOI: 10.1107/s0108270187007352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monoclinic and triclinic forms of [1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)propane](η6-methyldiphenylphosphine)(methyldiphenylphosphine)molybdenum(0) benzene solvate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The molecular structure of 2 has no crystallographic symmetry, although small conformational changes reveal its C s molecular symmetry. The unremarkable metric data of Table compare to that previously reported for other (η 6 -arene)Mo(P) 3 complexes such as (η 6 -C 6 H 5 (PPhMe))Mo(PPh 2 Me) 3 , [(μ 2 -η 6 -C 6 H 5 (PMe 2 ))Mo(PPhMe 2 ) 2 ] 2 , and (η 6 -C 6 H 5 (PPhMe))Mo(PPh 2 Me)(Ph 2 PCH(Me)CH 2 PPh 2 ) . The molecular structures of 1 − 5 that were computed using the PM3(tm) method are compared in Table with those that were determined by X-ray crystallography for 1 − 4 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The molecular structure of 2 has no crystallographic symmetry, although small conformational changes reveal its C s molecular symmetry. The unremarkable metric data of Table compare to that previously reported for other (η 6 -arene)Mo(P) 3 complexes such as (η 6 -C 6 H 5 (PPhMe))Mo(PPh 2 Me) 3 , [(μ 2 -η 6 -C 6 H 5 (PMe 2 ))Mo(PPhMe 2 ) 2 ] 2 , and (η 6 -C 6 H 5 (PPhMe))Mo(PPh 2 Me)(Ph 2 PCH(Me)CH 2 PPh 2 ) . The molecular structures of 1 − 5 that were computed using the PM3(tm) method are compared in Table with those that were determined by X-ray crystallography for 1 − 4 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The unremarkable metric data of Table 2 compare to that previously reported for other (η 6 -arene)Mo(P) 3 complexes such as (η 6 -C 6 H 5 (PPhMe))Mo(PPh 2 Me) 3 , 28 [(µ 2 -η 6 -C 6 H 5 (PMe 2 ))-Mo(PPhMe 2 ) 2 ] 2 , 29 and (η 6 -C 6 H 5 (PPhMe))Mo(PPh 2 Me)-(Ph 2 PCH(Me)CH 2 PPh 2 ). 30 The molecular structures of 1-5 that were computed using the PM3(tm) method are compared in Table 2 with those that were determined by X-ray crystallography for 1-4. Figure 8 (left) depicts the computed structures of 1-5 as space-filled models.…”
Section: Table 2 Selected Interatomic Distances (å) and Angles (Deg) ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computed molecular structure of (η 6 -C 6 H 6 )Mo(PH 3 ) 3 gives bond distances that are within 0.03 Å and angles that are within 3° of the crystal structure of (η 6 -C 6 H 6 )Mo(TRIPOD) . The computed distances of Mo−C(arene) av = 2.33 Å and Mo−P = 2.41 Å are comparable with the distances of Mo−C(arene) av = 2.29 Å and Mo−P = 2.42 Å which have been determined for several (η 6 -arene)Mo(phosphine) 3 complexes that bear a variety of phosphine ligands. ,, The structure from the Hartree−Fock calculation is also reasonable except for the Mo−P distance, which is 0.2 Å too long.…”
Section: Computational Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%