1993
DOI: 10.1128/aem.59.8.2713-2716.1993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monoclonal antibodies that react with live Listeria spp

Abstract: Seven monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) against Listeria spp. that were reactive with live Listeria spp. were developed. Two of these MAbs (55-8 and 55-37) were members of the immunoglobulin M class, and all other MAbs were members of the immunoglobulin G class. MAb 55-23 reacted with 148 of 157 strains tested. MAb 34-51 reacted with serotype 1/2a, 1/2b, and 1/2c strains and exhibited a scattered reaction pattern with strains belonging to other serotypes. MAb 55-44 reacted with all of the strains belonging to serot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reactivity patterns of these antibodies indicate that they are different in terms of specificity from MAbs to surface antigens of listeriae described by other investigators, which are Listeria genus specific (7,11) or specific for L. monocytogenes and one or more other Listeria species (3,30,31) or react preferentially (14) or exclusively (4) with L. monocytogenes strains of all serotypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The reactivity patterns of these antibodies indicate that they are different in terms of specificity from MAbs to surface antigens of listeriae described by other investigators, which are Listeria genus specific (7,11) or specific for L. monocytogenes and one or more other Listeria species (3,30,31) or react preferentially (14) or exclusively (4) with L. monocytogenes strains of all serotypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The overall stress conditions affected the antibody reactions to whole cells ranging from 8% to 59% for all the antibodies. In most enzyme-immunoassay applications (indirect or sandwich assay), the detection limit is 10 6 CFU ml )1 (Torensma et al 1993;Oladepo et al 2000;Valdivieso-Garcia et al 2001), and it is speculated that these levels of reduction in ELISA reactions, in some situations, will give false-negative results with cells at the lower detection range. However, the impact would be even more severe for biosensor applications designed to detect low number of cells (Abdel-Hamid et al 1999;Iqbal et al 2000;Leonard et al 2003;Geng et al 2004;Taitt et al 2004;Zhang and Ji 2004) when reduction in antibody reactions will certainly give false-negative results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCR-SSCP is reported to be capable of detecting single-base mutations in a fragment of a few hundred base pairs and seems to be a promising method for the differentiation of species. Because of the particular interest and expertise in our laboratory, we first focused on the applicability of PCR-SSCP for the detection and identification of Clostridium and Listeria species (10,24,26). Then we used 111 bacterial isolates belonging to 15 genera and 40 species to further test this technique ( Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%