1992
DOI: 10.1161/01.str.23.2.247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monoclonal leukocyte antibody does not decrease the injury of transient focal cerebral ischemia in cats.

Abstract: Background and Purpose: We tested the hypothesis that inhibition of leukocyte function by administration of monoclonal antibody 60.3 (MoAb 60.3) improves electrophysiological recovery and decreases injury volume following transient focal cerebral ischemia in cats.Methods: Halothane-anesthetized cats underwent 90 minutes of left middle cerebral artery and bilateral common carotid artery occlusion followed by 180 minutes of reperfusion. Cats were assigned to receive either 2 mg/kg MoAb 60.3 (n=8) directed at the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Administration of a blocking antibody to CD18 (clone designate R 3.3) demonstrated therapeutic efficacy effective in an ischemiareperfusion model of spinal cord injury 29 but not in a model of irreversible cerebral embolic stroke. 16 In the latter study, administration of a monoclonal antibody to CD18 (clone designate MoAb 60.3) did not improve CBF or evoked potentials. By using mice with severe functional hypomorphism of the CD18 gene product, the current studies support our hypothesis that CD18 is indeed pathogenic in PMN recruitment and cerebral tissue damage in stroke.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Administration of a blocking antibody to CD18 (clone designate R 3.3) demonstrated therapeutic efficacy effective in an ischemiareperfusion model of spinal cord injury 29 but not in a model of irreversible cerebral embolic stroke. 16 In the latter study, administration of a monoclonal antibody to CD18 (clone designate MoAb 60.3) did not improve CBF or evoked potentials. By using mice with severe functional hypomorphism of the CD18 gene product, the current studies support our hypothesis that CD18 is indeed pathogenic in PMN recruitment and cerebral tissue damage in stroke.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In animal models of cerebral or spinal stroke, administration of blocking antibody to CD18 either improved outcome 14,15 or had no effect on outcome. 16 Based on the recent identification of the importance of ICAM-1 in the pathogenesis of reperfused stroke, we hypothesized that mice deficient in CD18 would be protected from cerebral ischemia; furthermore, given the negative data in the EnlimoMab trial, we hypothesized that the beneficial effects of CD18 deficiency would be most apparent in a model of reperfused (compared with nonreperfused) stroke. To test these hypotheses, deletionally mutant mice (hypomorphic for CD18 17 ) were used to study the effects of focal cerebral ischemia with or without reperfusion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6 However, administration of this antibody also led to partial peripheral white blood cell depletion. Treatment with an antibody to the CD18 subunit has yielded controversial results; in a feline model, the antibody did not alter cerebral blood flow or infarct volume, 7 whereas in a primate model, it improved microvascular patency after cerebral ischemia/ reperfusion. 8 Antibody-antigen interactions can lead to complex responses, including triggering of signal transduction events and incomplete inactivation of functional binding sites on the target molecule.…”
Section: See Editorial Comment Page 139mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13-u ' 18 After injury volume was estimated, the slices of brain were placed in 10% buffered formalin for 1 to 2 days. Ipsilateral and contralateral temporal and parietal lobes of the middle four slices were subsequently sectioned into three cortical gray matter regions (inferior temporal, lateral temporal-parietal, and superior parietal) for regional CBF determinations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%