2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/ivs.2017.7995767
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monocular localization within sparse voxel maps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LiDAR localization within LiDAR maps (Ding et al, 2020;Egger et al, 2018;Fu et al, 2018;Levinson & Thrun, 2010;Wolcott & Eustice, 2017), visual localization within visual maps (Murartal & Tardos, 2017;Wong et al, 2017), visual localization within LiDAR maps (Wolcott & Eustice, 2014;Zuo et al, 2020), radar localization within radar maps (Saftescu et al, 2020) and radar localization within LiDAR maps (Yin et al, 2020). Among these approaches, LiDAR localization within LiDAR maps is usually considered to be the most accurate one (Kuutti et al, 2018), and is the focus of this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LiDAR localization within LiDAR maps (Ding et al, 2020;Egger et al, 2018;Fu et al, 2018;Levinson & Thrun, 2010;Wolcott & Eustice, 2017), visual localization within visual maps (Murartal & Tardos, 2017;Wong et al, 2017), visual localization within LiDAR maps (Wolcott & Eustice, 2014;Zuo et al, 2020), radar localization within radar maps (Saftescu et al, 2020) and radar localization within LiDAR maps (Yin et al, 2020). Among these approaches, LiDAR localization within LiDAR maps is usually considered to be the most accurate one (Kuutti et al, 2018), and is the focus of this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%