2018
DOI: 10.1002/hon.2497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monocyte subsets and their phenotypes during treatment with BCR‐ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors for Philadelphia chromosome‐positive leukemia

Abstract: BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are effective agents in the treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemia. However, vascular events have developed in some patients receiving each TKI. The perturbation of circulating monocyte subsets and their expressions of chemokine and scavenger receptors are associated with the development of cardiovascular events. Here, we examined the subsets of circulating monocytes and their phenotypes in 51 patients treated with imatinib, nilotinib, and dasatinib, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among patients with Philadelphia chromosome‐positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia treated with imatinib, the levels of classical monocytes were lower than those in the healthy control group. Additionally, no particular differences were found in the proportions of monocyte subsets between groups treated with imatinib, nilotinib or dasatinib and the control group 101 . In contrast to healthy blood donors, patients with ALL had remarkably lower levels of CD14+ monocytes following chemotherapy.…”
Section: Quantitative Dependencies Between Monocyte Subsets and Theirmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among patients with Philadelphia chromosome‐positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia treated with imatinib, the levels of classical monocytes were lower than those in the healthy control group. Additionally, no particular differences were found in the proportions of monocyte subsets between groups treated with imatinib, nilotinib or dasatinib and the control group 101 . In contrast to healthy blood donors, patients with ALL had remarkably lower levels of CD14+ monocytes following chemotherapy.…”
Section: Quantitative Dependencies Between Monocyte Subsets and Theirmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Additionally, no particular differences were found in the proportions of monocyte subsets between groups treated with imatinib, nilotinib or dasatinib and the control group. 101 In contrast to healthy blood donors, patients with ALL had remarkably lower levels of CD14+ monocytes following chemotherapy. Moreover, in the patients who were G-CSF treated, significantly more often intermediate monocytes and less often classical monocytes were observed.…”
Section: Haematological Malignancies and Bone Marrow Transplantationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Cells were stained with the following antibodies: PerCP-Cy5.5-conjugated anti-human CD3 (clone UCHT-1; Tonbo Biosciences, San Diego, CA), BV421-conjugated anti-human CD11c (clone 3.9; BioLegend, San Diego, CA), FITC-conjugated anti-human CD14 (clone M5E2; BioLegend), BV510-conjugated anti-human CD16 (clone 3G8; BioLegend), PerCP-Cy5.5-conjugated anti-human CD19 (clone HIB19; Tonbo Biosciences), PerCP-Cy5.5-conjugated anti-human CD20 (clone 2H7; Tonbo Biosciences), APC-Cy7-conjugated anti-human CD56 (clone HCD56; BioLegend), and PE-conjugated anti-human HLA-DR (clone L243; BioLegend). The gating strategy for classical, intermediate, and nonclassical monocytes, myeloid DCs (MDCs), plasmacytoid DCs (PDCs), and CD56 bright and CD56 dim NK cell subsets has been described previously [18][19][20][21]. Flow cytometry was performed using a FACSAria II (BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA), and data were analyzed using FlowJo 10.3 software (FlowJo, Ashland, OR).…”
Section: Flow Cytometry Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PB samples were prepared as previously described. 6 The gating strategy for unconventional T cells is described in a previous report 7 ( Figure 1A). Compared with the control group, the number of white blood cells was significantly lower in the group that received imatinib (P = .009) and IFN (P = .009; Figure 1B).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%