2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-53412-1_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monogamy of Quantum Correlations - A Review

Abstract: Monogamy is an intrinsic feature of quantum correlations that gives rise to several interesting quantum characteristics which are not amenable to classical explanations. The monogamy property imposes physical restrictions on unconditional sharability of quantum correlations between the different parts of a multipartite quantum system, and thus has a direct bearing on the cooperative properties of states of multiparty systems, including large many-body systems. On the contrary, a certain party can be maximally … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 217 publications
(423 reference statements)
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More general (measure-independent) features of QCs in multipartite systems have also been explored, demonstrating in particular that, unlike entanglement measures [320], no measure of QCs beyond entanglement can satisfy a conventional monogamy inequality on all states of three or more parties [74]. However, alternative monogamy constraints that impose trade-offs between QCs and other resources in tripartite systems, such as entanglement, coherence, and local entropies, can be derived [176,177,222,223,85,321,322]. Even more generally, the results reviewed in Section 4.1.1 reveal that QCs beyond entanglement do obey fundamental limits to their shareability, which is another testament to their true quantum nature, as opposed to the case of freely shareable classical correlations.…”
Section: Concluding Remarks and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More general (measure-independent) features of QCs in multipartite systems have also been explored, demonstrating in particular that, unlike entanglement measures [320], no measure of QCs beyond entanglement can satisfy a conventional monogamy inequality on all states of three or more parties [74]. However, alternative monogamy constraints that impose trade-offs between QCs and other resources in tripartite systems, such as entanglement, coherence, and local entropies, can be derived [176,177,222,223,85,321,322]. Even more generally, the results reviewed in Section 4.1.1 reveal that QCs beyond entanglement do obey fundamental limits to their shareability, which is another testament to their true quantum nature, as opposed to the case of freely shareable classical correlations.…”
Section: Concluding Remarks and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, we briefly outline the definition of the monogamy of entanglement and the measure of multipartite entanglement in the present study. For an N -qubit system with state space H A1 ⊗ H A2 ⊗ · · · ⊗ H AN , taking the subsystem A 1 as a "node" [34], if the entanglement between the particles A 1 and A 2 , · · · , A N satisfies the inequality…”
Section: Multipartite Entanglement and Quantum Phase Transitions mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the basic cluster contains seven sites, as shown in Fig. 1(a), we choose the central site (labeled by 1) as the "node" [34], and calculate the seven-partite entanglement τ 1|2,··· ,7 for studying the performances of multipartite entanglement in the QPT. The Hamiltonian of basic cluster can be written as…”
Section: Ii1 Triangular Latticementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, recent theoretical advancements have brought to light unexpected structural relationships between the observable aspects of a bipartite singlet state [8,24]. Many interpretations can explain the predictions of quantum theory, but not all of them can account for these subtle nuances, especially in the context of quantum monogamy [25][26][27][28]. In particular, changing the number of variables investigated with an n-quantum system can change the expected rates of coincidence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%