“…9 This assumption was supported by the HMBC correlations of H 2 -3 (δ H 3.11, d, J = 15.0 Hz, and 2.47, dt, J = 15.0, 5.0 Hz) and H-6 (δ H 7.60, d, J = 8.8 Hz) with C-4 (δ C 152.1, s) and C-9b (δ C 127.4, s), as well as the ROESY correlation between H-5 (δ H 7.12, d, J = 8.8 Hz) and 4-OCH 3 (δ H 3.90, s). The absolute configuration of C-1 was assigned as S by comparing the optical rotation value (+36.3 [c 0.10, CHDCl 3 ]) with that of monolaterol (+83.4 [c 0.10, MeOH]), 10 which also supported that the experimental CD curve of 1 matched well with that of monolaterol 10 (Figure 2). This assignment was unambiguously confirmed by using X-ray diffraction analysis with Cu Kα radiation (Figure 3).…”