In
this paper, according to the C(111) surface and Ti(112̅0)
surface relative positions, three stacking interface models were constructed
by the first-principles method, and they were defined as 1st-C(111)/Ti(112̅0),
2nd-C(111)/Ti(112̅0), and 4th-C(111)/Ti(112̅0), respectively.
After calculation, the work of interfacial adhesion of the 1st-C(111)/Ti(112̅0),
2nd-C(111)/Ti(112̅0), and 4th-C(111)/Ti(112̅0) interface
models is found to be 9.689, 10.246, and 9.714 J/m2, respectively,
and their interface energies are observed to be 1.064, 0.507, and
1.039 J/m2, respectively. Moreover, the electronic characteristics
of C(111)/Ti(112̅0) interfaces are dominated by polar covalent
bonds, supplemented by certain metallicity. When the strain reaches
13, 15, and 12%, respectively, the maximum tensile stress values of
1st-C(111)/Ti(112̅0), 2nd-C(111)/Ti(112̅0), and 4th-C(111)/Ti(112̅0)
interface models are observed to be 16.207, 19.183, and 17.393 GPa,
respectively. After all C(111)/Ti(112̅0) interfaces fracture
under tension, the Ti atoms of the Ti(112̅0) surface are transferred
to the C(111) surface, indicating that the strength of Ti–C
bonds at the interface is higher than the strength of Ti–Ti
bonds inside the Ti(112̅0) surface. The maximum value of the
sliding potential energy surface is 1.709 J/m2; the maximum
value of the potential energy curve is 0.445 J/m2; and
the ideal shear strength of the C(111)/Ti(112̅0) interface is
0.386 GPa. In summary, the interfacial adhesion property of the 2nd-C(111)/Ti(112̅0)
interface is better than those of 1st-C(111)/Ti(112̅0) and 4th-C(111)/Ti(112̅0)
interfaces.