2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monolayered versus multilayered electroless NiP coatings: Impact of the plating approach on the microstructure, mechanical and corrosion properties of the coatings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculated larger cell parameter compared to the tabulated one (a = 3.8898 Å) can be attributed to the incorporation of P, which has a smaller atomic radius than Pd [ 31 ], into interstitial positions of the fcc-Pd lattice. This cell expansion has been observed in other electroless metallic coatings like NiP [ 32 ]. The PU did not give any detectable response, which means that it is basically amorphous.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The calculated larger cell parameter compared to the tabulated one (a = 3.8898 Å) can be attributed to the incorporation of P, which has a smaller atomic radius than Pd [ 31 ], into interstitial positions of the fcc-Pd lattice. This cell expansion has been observed in other electroless metallic coatings like NiP [ 32 ]. The PU did not give any detectable response, which means that it is basically amorphous.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“… 43 Upon heat treatment, a further increase in the coatings’ hardness is observed, as shown in Table 4 , possibly due to the precipitation of the hard Ni 3 P (indicated by the XRD pattern after heat treatment ( Figure 1 b)). Commonly, various studies 40 , 44 have reported the effective increase in the hardness of the NiP and NiP composite coatings after heat treatment upon the formation of the Ni 3 P phase. It is worth mentioning that, as shown in Table 4 and Figure 7 , there is an agreement between the results of nanoindentation hardness and Vickers’ microhardness measurements in regard to the pattern and values of microhardness results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,20 It is to be noted here that addition of an interface may actually modify (improve) the mechanical properties of EN coating. 21 Now, the present samples for tribological tests are subjected to double bath deposition to have higher coating thickness in apprehension that the coating may get worn out totally during the tests. Roughly, it is found that the individual layers contribute around 20 µm of deposition thickness.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%