2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2009.07.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monolith loop reactor for hydrogenation of glucose

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
35
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
5
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the applied coating recipe approximately 9 wt.% of the catalyst was deposited on the monolith with the first dip-coating step. This value is in the same range to the values reported in the literature [5,24,25].…”
Section: Preparation Of the Monolithic Catalystssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the applied coating recipe approximately 9 wt.% of the catalyst was deposited on the monolith with the first dip-coating step. This value is in the same range to the values reported in the literature [5,24,25].…”
Section: Preparation Of the Monolithic Catalystssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Another possible reason like partially dissolution of the first deposited catalytic layer is not likely due to the expected stability after calcination step. Furthermore the results from Turek et al [24,25] indicates that the kind of active material on the base powder has also a significant influence on the coating results. The reason for this lies in the different zeta potentials between catalyst slurry and carrier.…”
Section: Preparation Of the Monolithic Catalystsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…[297,300,301] The gas-liquid hydrogenation of glucose to sorbitol has been reported using a washcoated Ru catalyst over γ-Al 2 O 3 support in a monolithic loop microreactor (400 cells per square inch (cpsi), corresponding to an average channel diameter below 0.625 mm) operated under slug flow ( Figure 3D; Table 6, entry 1). [150] The reaction rate in the microreactor was 1.5-2 times faster than that in a stirred tank slurry reactor. External (gas-liquid) mass transfer limitations were observed in the slurry reactor, while internal (liquid-solid) mass transfer limitations were more prevalent in the microreactor since the gas-liquid slug flow generated in monolithic channels considerably enhanced the external mass transfer.…”
Section: Hydrogenation Of Sugars To Sugar Alcoholsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…[150] The reaction rate in the microreactor was 1.5-2 times faster than that in a stirred tank slurry reactor. [150] The hydrogenation of a mixture of C 5 sugars (L-arabinose and D-galactose towards arabitol and galactitol, respectively) was performed in a microreactor (d C = 2.4 mm) packed with 0.5 wt% Ru/C catalysts subject to an upstream slug flow ( Figure 3F; Table 6, entry 2). Thus, monolithic catalysts with sufficiently thin catalyst layers (to overcome internal mass transfer limitations), combined with their enhanced gas-liquid mass transfer, might be a promising alternative to suspended powder catalysts for enhancing the overall reaction rate for the hydrogenation of glucose.…”
Section: Hydrogenation Of Sugars To Sugar Alcoholsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation