2018
DOI: 10.1364/optica.5.000528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monolithic quantum-dot distributed feedback laser array on silicon

Abstract: Electrically-pumped lasers directly grown on silicon are key devices interfacing silicon microelectronics and photonics. We report here, for the first time, an electrically-pumped, room-temperature, continuous-wave (CW) and single-mode distributed feedback (DFB) laser array fabricated in InAs/GaAs quantum-dot (QD) gain material epitaxially grown on silicon. CW threshold currents as low as 12 mA and single-mode side mode suppression ratios (SMSRs) as high as 50 dB have been achieved from individual devices in t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The major challenges of heteroepitaxial growth of GaAs or InP on Si are the antiphase domains (APDs) and threading dislocations (TDs) due to the polar on non-polar and latticemismatched heteroepitaxial growth, respectively. Over the past years, however, researchers have developed methods to grow single-domain III-V materials on offcut and on-axis Si substrates successfully, especially GaP and GaAs on Si [9][10][11], which in turn has led to the successful demonstration of telecommunication wavelength lasers on GaP/Si and GaAs/Si virtual substrates [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. In addition to the APD issue, the high density of TDs originating from the lattice mismatch between Si and III-V materials, 4 % and 7 % for GaAs and InP, respectively, results in a significant degradation of the laser performance due to the formation of nonradiative recombination centers [20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major challenges of heteroepitaxial growth of GaAs or InP on Si are the antiphase domains (APDs) and threading dislocations (TDs) due to the polar on non-polar and latticemismatched heteroepitaxial growth, respectively. Over the past years, however, researchers have developed methods to grow single-domain III-V materials on offcut and on-axis Si substrates successfully, especially GaP and GaAs on Si [9][10][11], which in turn has led to the successful demonstration of telecommunication wavelength lasers on GaP/Si and GaAs/Si virtual substrates [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. In addition to the APD issue, the high density of TDs originating from the lattice mismatch between Si and III-V materials, 4 % and 7 % for GaAs and InP, respectively, results in a significant degradation of the laser performance due to the formation of nonradiative recombination centers [20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, zero-dimensional materials-III-V quantum dots (QDs)-monolithically grown on Si platform as gain materials provide various advantages, including low lasing threshold, reduced temperature sensitivity 38 , and less sensitivity to defects, and hence have been widely investigated in past few years. Until now, high-performance III-V QD distributed feedback lasers, ridge-waveguide lasers, microring or microdisk lasers have been successfully demonstrated, all of which were epitaxially grown on Si, including off-cut (4°-6°) Si substrate 38,39 , patterned on-axis Si (001) [40][41][42][43] and on-axis Si (001) [44][45][46] . However, monolithically integrated III-V PC lasers on the well-established Si CMOS fabrication technologies have not been demonstrated yet due to the high requirement of crystal quality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…III-V quantum dots have proven superior optical properties and high tolerance to defects in lasers directly grown on silicon 8 . GaAs-based QD lasers on Si in 1-1.3 μm range have demonstrated excellent performance with diverse designs [9][10][11] . However, to extend the emission wavelength of InAs/(In)GaAs based QDs beyond 1.3 μm has been challenging [12][13][14] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%