Three copper(II) complexes of (L1)–, [CuL1Cl] (1), [CuL1Br]n (2) and [Cu2(L1)2(μ1,3‐NCS)2] (3), and two copper(II) complexes of HL1, [Cu(HL1)X2] (X = Cl–, 4; X = Br–, 5), have been prepared and characterised [where HL1 is the Schiff‐base ligand derived from pyrrole‐2‐carbaldehyde and 2‐aminomethylpyridine]. The removal of a chloride ion and deprotonation of [Cu(HL1)Cl2] (4) to form [CuL1Cl] (1) worked well. However, attempts to protonate [CuL1Cl] with HCl to re‐form [Cu(HL1)Cl2] were not successful. X‐ray structure determinations revealed that 1 is a N3Cl‐coordinated square‐planar copper(II) monomer [CuL1Cl], whereas 3 is a doubly end‐to‐end thiocyanate‐bridged square‐pyramidal copper(II) dimer [Cu2(L1)2(μ1,3‐NCS)2]. The structure determinations on 4 and 5 showed that in both cases the copper(II) ion is in a distorted square‐planar N2X2 environment, with the pyrrole NH remaining non‐deprotonated and uncoordinated. Variable‐temperature magnetic susceptibility investigations carried out on the end‐to‐end thiocyanate doubly bridged square‐pyramidal copper(II) dimer 3 showed that no magnetic coupling occurs between the two copper(II) ions; it exhibits Curie‐like magnetic behaviour.(© Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 69451 Weinheim, Germany, 2009)