2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ica.2011.01.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mononuclear and tetranuclear palladacycles with terdentate [C,N,N] and [C,N,O] Schiff base ligands. C–H versus C–Br activation reactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 48 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[25][26][27] The bond lengths and angles appear reasonable for palladium (II) species with cyclometalated groups. [26][27][28][29][30] As all the ligands form N^N^C pincer-type complexes, the cyclometalated group is thus trans to the dimethylamino group, while the imine nitrogen is trans to the acetate in Pd1 and the iodide in Pd2. The Pd-N bond length trans to the carbon donor is longer than that the Pd-N trans to the halide as would be expected due to the stronger trans influence of the naphthyl ligand.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[25][26][27] The bond lengths and angles appear reasonable for palladium (II) species with cyclometalated groups. [26][27][28][29][30] As all the ligands form N^N^C pincer-type complexes, the cyclometalated group is thus trans to the dimethylamino group, while the imine nitrogen is trans to the acetate in Pd1 and the iodide in Pd2. The Pd-N bond length trans to the carbon donor is longer than that the Pd-N trans to the halide as would be expected due to the stronger trans influence of the naphthyl ligand.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%