2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2015.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mononucleotide repeats in the SMAD4 gene promoter in colon carcinoma tissue of Croatian patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recent studies indicate mutations of alternative promoters as a mechanism leading to aberrant usage of one promoter over the other [37,38]. Functionally relevant mutations in alternative SMAD4 promoters were shown to be quite rare, so in the case of this tumor suppressor other mechanisms and interactions with the cellular proteotranscriptome may be more relevant [39][40][41][42]. The cellular content of transcripts with alternative 5′-UTRs results from a variety of factors and the exact mechanisms behind the process of aberrant alternative transcription initiation in cancer remains to be elucidated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recent studies indicate mutations of alternative promoters as a mechanism leading to aberrant usage of one promoter over the other [37,38]. Functionally relevant mutations in alternative SMAD4 promoters were shown to be quite rare, so in the case of this tumor suppressor other mechanisms and interactions with the cellular proteotranscriptome may be more relevant [39][40][41][42]. The cellular content of transcripts with alternative 5′-UTRs results from a variety of factors and the exact mechanisms behind the process of aberrant alternative transcription initiation in cancer remains to be elucidated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two somatic mutations that disturb transcription were found in endometrial carcinoma (11). Another somatic alteration in this region was found in tumor tissues of patients with pancreatic, colorectal and endometrial cancer and it was shown to significantly reduce promoter activity of this segment (6,7,12). Relatively small number of studies analyzed methylation status of the SMAD4 5' regulatory region, mostly in gastrointestinal cancers, and it was not found to be a major mechanism of SMAD4 inactivation (9,13,14,15).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%