1982
DOI: 10.1109/tpas.1982.317086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monopolar Corona on Bundle Conductors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results have shown that the total corona losses increased with wind speed for the bipolar model while the change could be neglected for the conductor‐to‐plane arrangement at low wind speed. However, the increase of the corona loss was also observed in [2, 3] for the unipolar model with a longer gap between the conductor and plane. It was explained by the fact that a larger number of ions were blown away from the inter‐electrode space when the electric field was weak.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results have shown that the total corona losses increased with wind speed for the bipolar model while the change could be neglected for the conductor‐to‐plane arrangement at low wind speed. However, the increase of the corona loss was also observed in [2, 3] for the unipolar model with a longer gap between the conductor and plane. It was explained by the fact that a larger number of ions were blown away from the inter‐electrode space when the electric field was weak.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…For the unipolar case, the increase of the corona current has been measured in the experiment [2, 3]. It becomes more complicated for the bipolar lines and no in‐depth analysis has been made.…”
Section: Effect Of Wind On Electric Field and Ion Flow Of Hvdc Transmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is now a relatively large literature on the space-charge problem. Early references include Townsend (1914), Felici (1963), Atten (1968) and Khalifa (1968) with more recent work by Janischewskyj & Gela (1979), Abdel-Salam (1982, 1983, Okubo et al (1982), Sunaga & Sawada (1980), S Hutton (1986). In much of the earlier work many approximations were made concerning the distribution of the field lines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%