2022
DOI: 10.1086/717894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monopoly Pricing, Optimal Randomization, and Resale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Work on scarcity strategies has mainly focused on discouraging consumer strategic delay (DeGraba (1995), Nocke and Peitz (2007), Möller and Watanabe (2010)). Creating scarcity for lowvaluation consumers can also help a monopolist to price discriminate, and may be optimal if revenues are non-concave (Wilson (1988), Bulow andRoberts (1989), Ferguson (1994), Loertscher and Muir (2022)). Both Debo et al (2012) and Stock and Balachander (2005) consider scarcity and social learning but in a setting with a privately informed seller, where scarcity does not help hide information from consumers, but instead may help reveal it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Work on scarcity strategies has mainly focused on discouraging consumer strategic delay (DeGraba (1995), Nocke and Peitz (2007), Möller and Watanabe (2010)). Creating scarcity for lowvaluation consumers can also help a monopolist to price discriminate, and may be optimal if revenues are non-concave (Wilson (1988), Bulow andRoberts (1989), Ferguson (1994), Loertscher and Muir (2022)). Both Debo et al (2012) and Stock and Balachander (2005) consider scarcity and social learning but in a setting with a privately informed seller, where scarcity does not help hide information from consumers, but instead may help reveal it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%