2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.04.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monoporous micropillar wick structures, II-optimization & theoretical limits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, a thicker liquid allows a higher liquid mass flow rate, which contributes to a higher q dry-out . This trend agrees with previous modeling based on the Darcy's equation and experimental observations 14,15 . However, increasing the height of the pillars increases the superheat at the solid surface.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In addition, a thicker liquid allows a higher liquid mass flow rate, which contributes to a higher q dry-out . This trend agrees with previous modeling based on the Darcy's equation and experimental observations 14,15 . However, increasing the height of the pillars increases the superheat at the solid surface.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…) was less profound for taller micropillars, which also led to a higher dryout heat flux. This trend agreed with previous theoretical and experimental studies [80,81].…”
Section: •K)supporting
confidence: 93%
“…Hornor et al [81] Performance of uniform micropillar evaporators experimentally tested in the literatures are summarized in Table 3.…”
Section: Squarely Packed Cylindrical Micropillar Arraysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 45 ] We also evaluated their dryout heat fluxes, as shown in Figure 6c. It can be found that the large mesh surface has the best performance with a dryout heat flux of 26.3 W cm −2 , ten times larger than the optimized micropillar surface ( d = 42, p = 90, and h = 100 μm) in the study by Horner et al [ 46 ] Dividing the heat flux by water latent heat, we converted the dryout heat flux into the limit of vapor flux for vapor generation applications (see Figure 6c). Given the solar absorptance measured in Figure 1f, the vapor flux generated under 1 Sun is only 1.49 kg (m 2 h) −1 , whereas the vapor generation limit of the large mesh surface is 418.94 kg/(m 2 h) −1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%