1999
DOI: 10.1121/1.427924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monostatic and bistatic reverberation statistics west of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge

Abstract: Monostatic and bistatic reverberation of highly resolved signals from very rough bottoms at one site is statistically analyzed. Scattering at a mean frequency of about 230 Hz from a large number of bottom footprints is considered. The reverberation envelope is found to be non-Rayleigh, with the degree of departure from Rayleigh dependent upon the bottom grazing angle for two cases considered, g Ϸ5°and 40°, and upon the bistatic angle in the entire range, Ϸ0°to 180°. These rough bottom observations can be expla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This figure also shows the scattering strength for the same problem, but with the basalt being represented by an elastic medium. The enhanced backscattering observed for the elastic bottom is consistent with the ARSRP observations [5,6].…”
Section: Accomplishments and Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This figure also shows the scattering strength for the same problem, but with the basalt being represented by an elastic medium. The enhanced backscattering observed for the elastic bottom is consistent with the ARSRP observations [5,6].…”
Section: Accomplishments and Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In 1997, this modeling capability has been successfully validated by comparison to other scattering theories for the simple two halfspace problem. The comparison to the in-plane, bistatic scattering strength results generated independently by Dorfman [5,6] for scattering off a basalt seabed, assuming the basalt to be a fluid medium, is shown in Fig.1. This figure also shows the scattering strength for the same problem, but with the basalt being represented by an elastic medium.…”
Section: Accomplishments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…First, we divide the surface up into a set of facets [13], each with its own height (h i ), length (d i ), and slope (s i ), as shown in two dimensions in Fig. 2.…”
Section: B Realistic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But it seems reasonable to believe that at least some portion of the bottom at or near the shelf break and on the slope is very rough, by which we mean that the roughness height scale compared with acoustic wavelength is large ( ). Spatial angulation of such roughness elements (or facets, [21]) can lead to significant out-of-plane scattering losses, and differences in up-slope down-slope propagation. 8 Because the bottom geology, the bathymetry, and the coastal front are horizontally anisotropic, acoustic propagation is also horizontally anisotropic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%