2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monoterpene emission of a boreal Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
47
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
7
47
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though 3-carene is one of the most dominant monoterpenes in European boreal forests its ion branching in PTR-ToF-MS has not been investigated [15,21,22]. Apart from the overall ratio difference, we observed similar branching ratio pattern for ions m/z 137, 95 and 81, but we have not observed the ion with m/z 67 [15].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Even though 3-carene is one of the most dominant monoterpenes in European boreal forests its ion branching in PTR-ToF-MS has not been investigated [15,21,22]. Apart from the overall ratio difference, we observed similar branching ratio pattern for ions m/z 137, 95 and 81, but we have not observed the ion with m/z 67 [15].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Emitted monoterpenes from Scots pine mainly included α-pinene and 3 -carene, matching the field observations in the boreal Scots pine dominated forest (e.g. Räisänen et al, 2009;Manninen et al, 1998). No fractional contribution of 3 -carene in P1025 and P1026 were observed which depends on the 3 -carene genotype Scots pine (Manninen et al, 1998).…”
Section: Chemical Composition Of Living Plant Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…8). Räisänen et al (2009) got a similar kind of ratio, 74 %, with the ecosystem scale emission potential of 290 ng m −2 s −1 measured in June-early September. The difference, 85 vs. 74 %, is rather small and within uncertainty estimates.…”
Section: Monoterpenes Their Emission Potentials and Differences To Bmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…As an example, even though branch scale monoterpene emissions from Scots pine are well-studied (Ruuskanen et al, 2005;Tarvainen et al, 2005;Hakola et al, 2006;Aalto et al, 2014Aalto et al, , 2015, ecosystem scale emissions from Scots pine dominated forests have been mainly explored in short campaigns (Rinne et al, 2000bGhirardo et al, 2010). Longer time series have also consisted of measurements from May to September only (Räisänen et al, 2009;Taipale et al, 2011). This has had a direct effect on the capability of models to predict monoterpene concentrations (Smolander et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%