2016
DOI: 10.4208/cicp.280315.140815a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monotone Finite Difference Schemes for Anisotropic Diffusion Problems via Nonnegative Directional Splittings

Abstract: Nonnegative directional splittings of anisotropic diffusion operators in the divergence form are investigated. Conditions are established for nonnegative directional splittings to hold in a neighborhood of an arbitrary interior point. The result is used to construct monotone finite difference schemes for the boundary value problem of anisotropic diffusion operators. It is shown that such a monotone scheme can be constructed if the underlying diffusion matrix is continuous on the closure of the physical domain … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(67 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A standard finite element discretization like the one we used here typically leads to solutions with oscillations for this type of problems (also see Zhang and Wu [58] for the case with the one-dimensional PME). The oscillations may be suppressed using, for instance, monotone schemes (e.g., see [8,44,46]) or structure-preserving schemes (e.g., see [41,42,48,57,58,59]). These schemes and their combination with adaptive mesh movement for PME are worth future investigations.…”
Section: Numerical Results For Pmementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A standard finite element discretization like the one we used here typically leads to solutions with oscillations for this type of problems (also see Zhang and Wu [58] for the case with the one-dimensional PME). The oscillations may be suppressed using, for instance, monotone schemes (e.g., see [8,44,46]) or structure-preserving schemes (e.g., see [41,42,48,57,58,59]). These schemes and their combination with adaptive mesh movement for PME are worth future investigations.…”
Section: Numerical Results For Pmementioning
confidence: 99%
“…4. How to suppress these oscillations using a monotone or structure-preserving scheme (e.g., see [8,41,42,44,46,48,57,58,59]) and to combine them with adaptive mesh movement for PME are worth future investigations.…”
Section: Conclusion and Further Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%