“…12) (-l)-/(r,x.,...,x,)^ff(0 holds on D n (a, r, r 0 ) where g satisfies(3.3), only the existence of a KS with the property (3.4) is guaranteed. This result generalizes Theorem 5 of the paper[5] of M. Svec. The example of the equation u" = -t~3u' all the KS-s of which are constant shows that in general one cannot claim more, and the necessary conditions for the existence of a NKS of (0.1) given in Section 4 imply that (3.3) cannot be omitted, either.Accordingto Theorem 2.3 and its corollary, Theorem 3.1 implies Corollary.…”