2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2022.114484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monotone tail functions: Definitions, properties, and application to risk-reducing strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In such situations, the existing decompositions are not valid. Hanbali and Linders (2021) provide decompositions for the VaR of comonotonic differences under more general assumptions using the concept of tail monotone functions, where the decomposition holds for certain values of the quantile level. Their results can readily be applied to decompose the TVaR as well, but only at confidence levels beyond some thresholds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In such situations, the existing decompositions are not valid. Hanbali and Linders (2021) provide decompositions for the VaR of comonotonic differences under more general assumptions using the concept of tail monotone functions, where the decomposition holds for certain values of the quantile level. Their results can readily be applied to decompose the TVaR as well, but only at confidence levels beyond some thresholds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The situation where g is not monotone is problematic. Hanbali and Linders (2021) address the problem and show that the equality F −1 g(X) (p) = g F −1 X (p) holds for specific values of p if the function g has a monotone tail. The present paper adds to their insights by showing that if g is not monotone, then that equality does not necessarily hold.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%