2016
DOI: 10.3765/amp.v2i0.3769
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monotonicity and the limits of disharmony

Abstract: The attested front/back harmony systems are monotonic in the sense thatthe harmony function that assigns the values front and back to suffixes ingiven harmonic stem contexts is subject to a constraint that only permitscontiguous patterns of values on a universally fixed scale of harmoniccontexts (ranging from the prototypical back harmony context [...B]_ tothe prototypical front one [...F]_ ). We argue that monotonicity alsoconstrains variation (harmony patterns involving the harmonic valuefront/back) and show… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have examined the harmonic behaviour of existing words combined with four different suffixes, based on an experiment with native speakers, and we provided a statistical analysis. Our results confirm the Height Effect and the Count Effect previously observed in corpus studies (Hayes & Interestingly, harmonic suffixes do not show a uniform behaviour eithercontrary to virtually all analyses of HVH, which typically assume that harmonically alternating suffixes are uniform in their harmonic behaviour (but see Rebrus & Törkenczy 2013). Further research is needed to map out the exact way in which different suffixes behave when attached to BN and BNN-stems, but we can see the general patterns in Figure 5.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…We have examined the harmonic behaviour of existing words combined with four different suffixes, based on an experiment with native speakers, and we provided a statistical analysis. Our results confirm the Height Effect and the Count Effect previously observed in corpus studies (Hayes & Interestingly, harmonic suffixes do not show a uniform behaviour eithercontrary to virtually all analyses of HVH, which typically assume that harmonically alternating suffixes are uniform in their harmonic behaviour (but see Rebrus & Törkenczy 2013). Further research is needed to map out the exact way in which different suffixes behave when attached to BN and BNN-stems, but we can see the general patterns in Figure 5.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…the phonological constraints on harmony and neutral vowels (Rebrus & T€ orkenczy 2016c). In the case of transparency this reduces variation (cf.…”
Section: Stem Typementioning
confidence: 99%