2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-34885-4_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monotonicity Detection and Enforcement in Longitudinal Classification

Abstract: The version in the Kent Academic Repository may differ from the final published version. Users are advised to check http://kar.kent.ac.uk for the status of the paper. Users should always cite the published version of record.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A full description of attributes used and their meaning can be found in a related study that previously used the same data preparation techniques in the context of automatic feature selection [12]. The same dataset has also been previously used to evaluate other longitudinal data mining approaches [11].…”
Section: Experimental Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A full description of attributes used and their meaning can be found in a related study that previously used the same data preparation techniques in the context of automatic feature selection [12]. The same dataset has also been previously used to evaluate other longitudinal data mining approaches [11].…”
Section: Experimental Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [11], the XGBoost algorithm was used to learn boosted decision tree models from the same longitudinal datasets used in this current paper. That study focused on improving model acceptability by using monotonicity constraints to produce monotonic classification models, instead of improving the longitudinal awareness of the models.…”
Section: The Proposed Longitudinal Classification Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%