2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2021.05.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monotonicity in sharing the revenues from broadcasting sports leagues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For developments in the literature on tournament design, we refer to the survey articles of Wright (2014), Kendall and Lenten (2017), and Lenten and Kendall (2021) and an excellent book of Csató (2021). Recently, Berganti ños and Moreno-Ternero (2020a;b, 2021, 2022ab; initiated axiomatic studies on broadcasting revenue sharing, which is another essential part of money sharing in competitions (e.g., in soccer leagues) using a different informational basis.…”
Section: Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For developments in the literature on tournament design, we refer to the survey articles of Wright (2014), Kendall and Lenten (2017), and Lenten and Kendall (2021) and an excellent book of Csató (2021). Recently, Berganti ños and Moreno-Ternero (2020a;b, 2021, 2022ab; initiated axiomatic studies on broadcasting revenue sharing, which is another essential part of money sharing in competitions (e.g., in soccer leagues) using a different informational basis.…”
Section: Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a competition, boxing judges need to closely observe the technical movements of the contestants. Gustavo Bergantiños proposed a method for glove tracking for amateur boxing judges.The results show that the gloves can be tracked accurately [8]. In this work, László Csató proposed a novel sports referee training system based on wearable sensors and a real-time official referee signal (ORS) segmentation/recognition method [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first one, precisely named equal treatment of equals, two teams are considered equal if each time they play a third team the audiences are the same in both games (e.g., Bergantiños and Moreno-Ternero, 2020a). In the second one, named weak equal treatment of equals, an additional condition is imposed to consider two teams as equal: the audiences in the two games played by the two teams (home and away) also coincide (e.g., Bergantiños and Moreno-Ternero, 2022b). In the third one, named symmetry, two teams are considered equal simply when their aggregate audiences in the league coincide (e.g., Bergantiños and Moreno-Ternero, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%