2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2008.05.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monovalent cation concentrations determine the types of Fe(III) hydroxysulfate precipitates formed in bioleach solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
53
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
53
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, Na + -mediated secondary iron minerals including both schwertmannite and sodium jarosite were not generated until the n(Fe)/n(Na) ratio reached a value of 0.1, at which the diffraction peak of schwertmannite was still present. Furthermore, the monovalent cations differed in terms of their jarosite-forming ability, specifically, K + > NH 4 + > Na + , which was consistent with previous reports by Gramp et al [28] and Bai et al [30]. This result indicated a difference in the abilities of these three ion species to catalyze the transformation of Fe into ferric hydroxysulfate minerals.…”
Section: Total Fe Deposition Efficiency During the Biogenic Formationsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, Na + -mediated secondary iron minerals including both schwertmannite and sodium jarosite were not generated until the n(Fe)/n(Na) ratio reached a value of 0.1, at which the diffraction peak of schwertmannite was still present. Furthermore, the monovalent cations differed in terms of their jarosite-forming ability, specifically, K + > NH 4 + > Na + , which was consistent with previous reports by Gramp et al [28] and Bai et al [30]. This result indicated a difference in the abilities of these three ion species to catalyze the transformation of Fe into ferric hydroxysulfate minerals.…”
Section: Total Fe Deposition Efficiency During the Biogenic Formationsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The As(III) adsorption efficiencies obtained herein were in accordance with the study of Liao et al [22], who reported that the amount of As(III) sorbed by schwertmannite (0.25 g/L) was only about 20% at Ph = 3.0, while the maximum As(III) removal (98%) occurs at about pH 7~9. The influence of the type and concentration of monovalent cations on the variety of secondary iron minerals and the critical mineralization value of schwertmannite and jarosite was previously studied [27][28][29][30]. However, a comparison of the heavy metal removal capacity of different biogenic secondary iron minerals mediated by monovalent cations has not yet been reported.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Cr(vi) And As(iii) Removal Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Schwertmannite (approximate formula Fe III 8O8(OH)6SO4): Formation is favoured in solutions of pH 3-4 containing moderate to high ferric sulfate but low monovalent cation concentrations [46]. Various elements can be adsorbed from solution onto schwertmannite [47][48][49].…”
Section: Mineral Dissolution In Acidic Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conditions such as these prevail in most laboratory-scale batch bioleaching tests because the microbial culture medium contains potassium and ammonium salts and the leaching is conducted at solution pH 1.5-2 [46,53].…”
Section: Mineral Dissolution In Acidic Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%