2018
DOI: 10.2147/opth.s170759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monovision LASIK in emmetropic presbyopic patients

Abstract: BackgroundTo evaluate the efficacy and patient satisfaction of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) monovision correction in presbyopic emmetropic patients.MethodsA retrospective review of 294 patients who underwent LASIK for monovision was conducted. All patients had preoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity in each eye of 20/25 or better in both eyes and underwent primary LASIK treatment in one eye with a near target; 82 patients underwent surgery in the distant eye for hypermetropia. Patients complete… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One characteristic difference between LBV and the simple monovision design was the blended vision achieved by SA induction [20] . In our study, 70% of the patients achieved 20/20 or better binocular distance vision as well as near vision, which was inferior than the monovision design [9] . We speculate that patients' baseline characteristics may partly explain the results.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One characteristic difference between LBV and the simple monovision design was the blended vision achieved by SA induction [20] . In our study, 70% of the patients achieved 20/20 or better binocular distance vision as well as near vision, which was inferior than the monovision design [9] . We speculate that patients' baseline characteristics may partly explain the results.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…Monovision is probably the most mature, albeit still popular, approach in presbyopia correction. Several studies have demonstrated its successful application in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) [8][9] . However, traditional monovision approaches may induce diminished contrast sensitivity and stereoacuity [10][11] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this technique, the patient selection is less crucial [ 20 ], but the non-dominant eye has a drastic decrease in far vision, and stereoscopic vision is impacted [ 21 ]. Therefore, up to 15% of patients who undergo monovision LASIK may be dissatisfied [ 22 ]. Second, we could not compare our patient population to patients who had multifocal lens implantation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the advantages of the above-mentioned techniques, post-operative healing and complications are of serious concern and are extensively studied. There are cases in which patients develop post-operative stromal haze, optical side effects such as glare and halos, , and discomfort . Experts suggest that they are likely arising from the disruption of the epithelial–stromal interface, , myofibroblast differentiation, , and wound-healing associated remodeling .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%