1975
DOI: 10.1109/tns.1975.4328168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monte Carlo Analysis of Dose Profiles near Photon Irradiated Material Interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
2

Year Published

1983
1983
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason becomes clear in the Figure function of the incident photon energy and distance from the interface as reported by Garth et al [9]. It can be seen that the maximum enhancement exceeds a factor of 30 and occurs at a photon energy of about 150 keV.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The reason becomes clear in the Figure function of the incident photon energy and distance from the interface as reported by Garth et al [9]. It can be seen that the maximum enhancement exceeds a factor of 30 and occurs at a photon energy of about 150 keV.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…For large bivariate data sets, the computational simplicity of the frequency polygon and the ease of determining exact equiprobable contours may outweigh the increased accuracy of a kernel estimate. Bivariate contour plots based on millions of observations are increasingly required in applications including high-energy physics simulation experiments (Garth et al 1975), cell sorters, and geographical data representation. Furthermore, such data are usually collected in binned form.…”
Section: Introduction and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let ¢(E) be the differential photon energy spectrum, (MeV/MeV) of any given cobalt-60 source, and let S(E) be the energy response function of the ionization chamber as defined in equation (6) The ionization chamber response function (figure 2) was also integrated over the gamma spectra which were measured for some of the source configurations of table 1. These measured spectra are shown in figure 7.…”
Section: Comparison Of Ionization Chamber Data With Calculated and Mementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7][8][9] It is therefore clear that it is important to have some knowledge of the low-energy scattered gamma component of the particular cobalt-60 source which one is using for radiation effects testing of microelectronic devices and circuits. It is also unfortunately true, however, that this information is difficult to obtain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%