2009
DOI: 10.1118/1.3158732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monte Carlo-based adaptive EPID dose kernel accounting for different field size responses of imagers

Abstract: The aim of this study is to present an efficient method to generate imager-specific Monte Carlo ͑MC͒-based dose kernels for amorphous silicon-based electronic portal image device dose prediction and determine the effective backscattering thicknesses for such imagers. EPID field sizedependent responses were measured for five matched Varian accelerators from three institutions with 6 MV beams at the source to detector distance ͑SDD͒ of 105 cm. For two imagers, measurements were made with and without the imager m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most accurate way of modeling scattering processes is to utilize Monte Carlo computation [1,4,23]. However, this is time consuming, demands knowledge, and the appropriate software.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most accurate way of modeling scattering processes is to utilize Monte Carlo computation [1,4,23]. However, this is time consuming, demands knowledge, and the appropriate software.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Antonuk et al, the proximity of the photodiodes to the scintillator make this effect negligible in a‐Si EPID. Wang et al . also pointed to a negligible glare effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method was not validated on the EPID as the robotic arm of the imager introduces backscattered radiation, (10) which changes fluence of a wide beam irradiation at the unshifted and shifted positions of the proposed procedure. This significant variation of fluence is not acceptable for the iterative method due to error propagation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%