2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.03.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monte Carlo-based assessment of the trade-off between spatial resolution, field-of-view and scattered radiation in the variable resolution X-ray CT scanner

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The loss of definition (resolution), arising from infinite focal spot limitation, occurs because of penumbra effect, which is a region partially irradiated (imperfect shadow) by xrays not originating from a point source. Technically, magnification introduces a trade-off between detector sampling resolution and geometric unshaprness (Arabi et al, 2015;Kamali-Asl et al, 2009). Therefore, the spatial resolution is greatly limited by the penumbra effect at high magnification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The loss of definition (resolution), arising from infinite focal spot limitation, occurs because of penumbra effect, which is a region partially irradiated (imperfect shadow) by xrays not originating from a point source. Technically, magnification introduces a trade-off between detector sampling resolution and geometric unshaprness (Arabi et al, 2015;Kamali-Asl et al, 2009). Therefore, the spatial resolution is greatly limited by the penumbra effect at high magnification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been always interests in designing detectors with the highest possible sensitivity (to detect very low activity concentration) and high spatial resolution (to localize the spatial distribution of the activity concentration). Normally, there is a fundamental tradeoff between improvements in sensitivity and spatial resolution of a detector, wherein strategies such as reducing the field of view (FOV) or modifying the distances between detector, object, and X-ray source (variable magnification) have been adopted to find an optimal compromise between these two key parameters (Lohrabian et al, 2019;Arabi et al, 2015;Arabi, KAMALIASL, Aghamiri;Kamali-Asl et al, 2009;Arabi et al, 2011;Sanaat et al, 2020).…”
Section: This Parameter Defines the Capability Of The Detector To Dis...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 7 8 ] CT imaging is an accurate and noninvasive method for detecting abnormalities, including tumors, bone fractures, and cardiovascular diseases. [ 9 10 11 12 ] Recently, an extended range of clinical studies has been performed on the potentials of CT imaging for the diagnosis and management of patients with COVID-19 disease. These studies, in fact, continue to fully identify the underlying COVID-19 features in CT images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 15 ] A recent study showed that DNA double-strand breaks and chromosome aberrations would increase in patients who undergo standard-dose CT scans, while there was no DNA damage in people who have been examined with low-dose CT scans. [ 16 ] Despite the significant advances made in software and hardware technology of CT scanners,[ 17 18 ] it is not yet considered a low-dose safe imaging modality. [ 19 ] Therefore, regarding CT scan's side effects,[ 20 ] the application of low-dose CT protocols would be of crucial importance in routine CT imaging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%