1993
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.48.1518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monte Carlo evaluation of path integrals for the nuclear shell model

Abstract: We present in detail a formulation of the shell model as a path integral and Monte Carlo techniques for its evaluation. The formulation, which linearizes the two-body interaction by an auxiliary field, is quite general, both in the form of the effective `one-body' Hamiltonian and in the choice of ensemble. In particular, we derive formulas for the use of general (beyond monopole) pairing operators, as well as a novel extraction of the canonical (fixed-particle number) ensemble via an activity expansion. We dis… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
278
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 259 publications
(280 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
278
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the CSPA is conceptually simple, well-documented [30] and straightforward to implement, it seems to be the method of choice for not too low temperatures. A possible alternative is a quantum Monte Carlo evaluation of the path integral (93) [144,145], but the numerics is much more demanding than for the CPSA, while the convergence at low T is in general rather poor, due to the familiar sign problem of Monte Carlo methods.…”
Section: Static Path Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the CSPA is conceptually simple, well-documented [30] and straightforward to implement, it seems to be the method of choice for not too low temperatures. A possible alternative is a quantum Monte Carlo evaluation of the path integral (93) [144,145], but the numerics is much more demanding than for the CPSA, while the convergence at low T is in general rather poor, due to the familiar sign problem of Monte Carlo methods.…”
Section: Static Path Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, SMMC calculations in neighboring even-even samarium and neodymium nuclei, for which there is no sign problem, were carried out up to β = 20 MeV −1 [16]. Systematic errors introduced by the discretization of β [2] are corrected by calculating E(β) for the two time slices of ∆β = 1/32 MeV −1 and ∆β = 1/64 MeV −1 and then performing a linear extrapolation to ∆β = 0. For β 3 MeV −1 , the dependence of E(β) on ∆β is weaker and an average value is taken instead.…”
Section: Ground-state Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical and collective properties of nuclei can be reliably calculated [6,13] by employing a class of interactions that have a good Monte Carlo sign in the grand-canonical formulation [2,13]. The projection on an even number of particles keeps the good sign of the interaction, allowing accurate calculations for even-even nuclei.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations