2014
DOI: 10.1002/ardp.201400259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monte Carlo Method‐Based QSAR Modeling of Penicillins Binding to Human Serum Proteins

Abstract: The binding of penicillins to human serum proteins was modeled with optimal descriptors based on the Simplified Molecular Input-Line Entry System (SMILES). The concentrations of protein-bound drug for 87 penicillins expressed as percentage of the total plasma concentration were used as experimental data. The Monte Carlo method was used as a computational tool to build up the quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) model for penicillins binding to plasma proteins. One random data split into training… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The correlation weights are calculated using the Monte Carlo optimization method [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. The optimization process make use of two parameters: (i) the threshold (T), which is a tool for classifying codes as either rare (and thus likely less reliable features, probably introducing noise into the model) or not rare features, which are used by the model and labeled as active; and (ii) the number of epochs (N), which is the number of cycles (sequence of modifications of correlation weights for all codes involved in model development) for the optimization [15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Optimal Descriptormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The correlation weights are calculated using the Monte Carlo optimization method [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. The optimization process make use of two parameters: (i) the threshold (T), which is a tool for classifying codes as either rare (and thus likely less reliable features, probably introducing noise into the model) or not rare features, which are used by the model and labeled as active; and (ii) the number of epochs (N), which is the number of cycles (sequence of modifications of correlation weights for all codes involved in model development) for the optimization [15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Optimal Descriptormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building up predictive models for endpoints related to nanomaterials is an important task of modern natural sciences [4]. Likely, the traditional quantitative structureproperty / activity relationships (QSPRs/QSARs) [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] based on the molecular structure are not able to solve this task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies [34,35,37,38,41] used these validation methodologies on SMILES notation optimal descriptor based QSAR models. In this respect the cross-validated correlation coefficient (Q 2 ) and error of estimation (s) were calculated based on predicted activity of training compounds.…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Test set Monte Carlo optimization runs is positive then that SA k is the promoter of increase; if CW(SA k ) from three independent Monte Carlo optimization runs is negative then that SA k is the promoter of decrease; if there are both positive and negative values of CW (Sk) in three runs of the Monte Carlo optimization process, then that SA k has an undefined role [26][27][28][29]32,33]. The list of all SA k , with the correlation weights for three runs of the Monte Carlo optimization process of the built QSAR model for maleimide derivatives is shown in Table S3.…”
Section: Training Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…QSAR modeling is often based on optimal descriptors calculated with the molecular graph [26][27][28]. The simplified molecular input-line entry system (SMILES) can be considered as an alternative for the representation of the molecular structure by the molecular graph [29][30][31]. A SMILES notation based optimal descriptor is a molecular descriptor which depends both on the molecular structure and the property under analysis, but does not explicitly depend on details from the 3D-molecular geometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%